On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 16:25, Ewen Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > Exceddingly happy with community.shed as proposed > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 5:15 PM Sam Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think amenity=community_centre makes sense, and I think there’s enough >> in Australia to warrant a specific community_centre=mens_shed (or maybe >> community_shed, which Wikipedia suggests as the generic term). >> > Yes, that has a lot going for it!
Still as community_centre=community_shed? Or maybe community_shed=man/woman? On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 16:35, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think shed (sometimes) describes the building not that they do. How > about community_centre=workshop? > No, they're not always located in a "shed", but as that's a pivotal part of the name, I think we should keep reference to it? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
