I think it'd take all three keys, if a item needs the further
clarification of man/woman (although my local is pretty inclusive I
think, so it's not absolute).
Also, if anyone's in the mood for cataloguing men's sheds, there aren't
many in Wikidata yet: https://w.wiki/9bA
:-)
On 7/10/19 3:07 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 16:25, Ewen Hill <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Exceddingly happy with community.shed as proposed
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 5:15 PM Sam Wilson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I think |amenity=community_centre| makes sense, and I think
there’s enough in Australia to warrant a specific
|community_centre=mens_shed| (or maybe |community_shed|, which
Wikipedia suggests as the generic term).
Yes, that has a lot going for it!
Still as community_centre=community_shed?
Or maybe community_shed=man/woman?
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 16:35, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I think shed (sometimes) describes the building not that they do.
How about community_centre=workshop?
No, they're not always located in a "shed", but as that's a pivotal
part of the name, I think we should keep reference to it?
Thanks
Graeme
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
