On 08/10/2019 09:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
7 Oct 2019, 23:02 by [email protected]:
"Community paths" (official term) are the most common path type in
the ACT and correspond in the OSM ATG to the tagging:
- highway=path
- foot=designated
- bicycle=designated
- segregated=no
Are you sure that ways signed as designated
for cyclists and pedestrians are far more
popular than all other ways?
The way that this question is phrased suggests that the user is either
simply trolling, or struggles with the concept of "discussion" and
treats this list as essentially write-only. This wouldn't be unique in
OSM; we've had people treat diaries and the wiki in a similar way before.
Until the author shows that they're willing to engage with other people
(replying to other people's posts, answering questions, explaining how
they've contributed to OSM) it's unlikely that anything of value will
come from these posts. The talk-au list is one of the sanest OSM lists
around; relatively speaking it has fewer people grandstanding and more
people collaborating to get things done than almost any other OSM forum
that I'm subscribed to.
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
