On 8/10/19 7:33 pm, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Are you sure that ways signed as designated
for cyclists and pedestrians are far more
popular than all other ways?
I think the issue is that he wants to tag paths like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474940890
which looks like this from the ground:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Footpath_in_Hackett,_Canberra,_Australia.jpg
the same as this path:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219976432
which from the ground looks like this:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bike_path_in_Dickson,_Canberra,_Australia.jpg
because the ACT Government calls both of them "Community Paths".
Every other mapper that has mapped in Canberra has been OK with the
concept of cycleway for the primary (low friction) network and footway
for the secondary (high friction) network.
This has been discussed on this list here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2015-September/010656.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-April/010901.html
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
