Thanks for the diligent report Nemanja. On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 23:54, Nemanja Bracko (E-Search) via Talk-au < talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Hi! > > As it has been a month since we got this report at talk-au, we wanted to > make a follow up to inform the community what were the results of our > internal check. > > We had revised our edits and changesets regarding added fences as roads, > in the area of QLD. We’ve noticed that three (3) of our editors made total > of 17 misleading edits in period of October 14th – October 21st. They had > marked fences as a road network. In just 4 of these 17 cases it was > absolutely clear that was a fence. We checked 2,653 edits in total. > Misleading edits were corrected. > It is 0.6% false ratio in this case. Rest of the edits were without any > issues. > > We have high standards when it comes to the quality of our edits, and we > do not have any quantity quotas, so we are focused to the quality over > quantity, but mistakes happens. We are constantly improving our processes > and every area has its own specifics, so we are learning these specifics. > In the future if you see any edit that is potentially misleading please let > us know. > > We just wanted to inform the community what were the results of our > internal check. > > Appreciate the support and looking forward to more collaboration. > > Very best regards to you all, > Nemanja > > > > > > *Od:* Nemanja Bracko (E-Search) > *Poslato:* četvrtak, 12. decembar 2019. 08:17 > *Cc:* talk-au@openstreetmap.org > *Tema:* Re: [talk-au] "Missing" Roads in Queensland > > > > Thanks all for raising this issue! We are going to take a quick pause on > our work in Queensland to take stock on this and make sure we’re going > about this properly. > > > > - Some concrete examples would be great, we’re currently reviewing our > team’s work to identify reported issues. We’ve got 3 reports from Cleary @ > 10/25, 11/11 and 11/12. All these 3 issues have been fixed and we are > paying more attention since then. We haven’t got any new reports, so we > will re-check our edits. Once again, please send us more examples if you > have. > - We’ve updated the wiki on organized editing projects – this is our > bad, and we’ll do a better job keeping these up to date. We added this > project and will make sure that this is kept up to date. > > > > To address a few other topics brought up in the thread (and hopefully to > assuage concerns about our team): > > > > - We prioritize quality edits above all else and *can guarantee we do > not have edit quotas to fill*. > - We actively QC our edits to OSM, but this is not to say this process > is bulletproof. We are continually appreciative of keen eyes and local > knowledge like yours to hold us accountable and push us to continue > improving the way we do our work. > > > > We’ll be following up, but don’t have all the answers at this moment. We > want you all to know we take these criticisms seriously and will take steps > to address any issues we can identify and avoid any potential future > missteps. > > > > Best Regards, > > Nemanja Bračko > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au