On 17/1/20 10:08 pm, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
17 Jan 2020, 11:42 by [email protected]:
I'm all for using the lifecycle prefix,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. I agreed
that if there's still remains there use ruined or destroyed, not
sure what the difference is though.
ruined implies that ruins still remain, destroyed may mean that or
that there is no trace at all
in practice difference is minor if any
Most of these will still have foundations in place, they may not be fit
for reuse but they are there. Some fire places and chimneys too remain.
I'll use ruined. Unless there are other ideas?
Once it's been cleared you could use demolished, removed or raised
Probably razed, not raised. I see not real difference.
, again not sure what the difference is. While damaged is not
documented it seems the perfect fit since there is no other
suitable tag for this on the wiki.
damaged seems to me a poor fit as prefix, damaged building is still a
building,
and I would expect building=something tag to be used.
By damaged I mean part of the building is intact but another part has
been damaged .. e.g. a truck has run part way through the building.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
