On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 14:13, John Bryant <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking more broadly, it looks like vine rows haven't been widely mapped > before. > Do you need to? I think it could be automatically assumed that all vineyards have their vines in rows, approx the same distance apart? I noticed vine_row_orientation <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vine_row_orientation>=* : vine row orientation (in degrees)on the wiki page - wouldn't that be sufficient? For vine *rows* (ie. the linear features within the vineyard), we've had > suggestions of natural=tree_row, > If you were going to put a tree_row on every row of vines, you'd have nothing but a solid mass of them! denotation=agricultural, > Sorry, not sure what you mean with this? and crop=grape, > Marked as being redundant as all vineyards grow grapes! :-) Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
