On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 19:22, cleary <[email protected]> wrote: > > In regard to sections of road that are subject to flooding, I think that > is a separate issue. Sometimes lengths of road may be signposted as > floodways and I am not aware if there is any appropriate OSM tagging for > that.
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 19:38, Andrew Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: > OSM doesn't really have any existing tagging for flood vulnerability of > water crossing, except perhaps bridge=low_water_crossing. ford=yes could > be anything from a track over a watercourse that runs maybe once a > decade to a crossing that's only safe to use for a couple of days a year > by vehicles equipped with a snorkel. > I can't see any reason not to just use ford=yes for floodways? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford suggests using depth=0 "for fords that are dry most of the year", together with intermittent=yes. I've done this for footpath fords, together with a description= "After heavy rain only" & also a maxdepth=1, based on the flood height post. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
