Under what I'm suggesting, "32" would become service=driveway,
driveway=pipestem.
So it's completely compatible with existing tagging - but provides a
little extra information.
cheers
Tom
----
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
On 24/09/2021 9:16 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 20:17, Tom Brennan <[email protected]> wrote:
Graeme - are you saying that you are tagging them all the same? Just as
separate ways?
Yep.
Here's one that I did recently:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-28.07919/153.23456, which was
apparently a single property that was sub-divided.
(Notes: I've just repositioned 32b's driveway as new imagery shows it
further over to the side, & 32d could have it's own short stub, but it's
not visible)
Anybody (particularly Emergency Services!) can see that to get to 32 you go
down here, & B is over there, C down that way, D right beside the road & A
is right up the end.
"32" is a service=driveway (+ access=private) from the road in to the A / C
junction, & each of the other three are exactly the same from 32 to each
house.
Thanks
Graeme
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
