When I've found the same situation, I've just left it as a single service=driveway from the road to where it splits, then two (or however many) more driveways from that point to each house.
Thanks Graeme On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 08:37, Tom Brennan <[email protected]> wrote: > In doing the rounds of the Willoughby LGA, I've noticed there are quite > a lot of shared driveways. This has likely come about from where one > previously large block has been subdivided - sometimes multiple times. > Each block typically has access to the main road via a narrow strip of > land, on which the shared driveway sits. > > The service=driveway tag is "a minor service road leading to a specific > property", so isn't really appropriate for driveways leading to multiple > properties. > > So I've started tagging some of these as driveway=pipestem, as per the > wiki: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems > > What do people think? > > The wiki also suggests service=pipestem as an alternative, but I prefer > service=driveway + driveway=pipestem as it's more compatible with > existing tagging - for most intents, if a shared driveway is > rendered/routed as a driveway, that should be acceptable. > > An example: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957104517 > > Enable the DCS NSW Base Map in ID editor if you want to see the strips > of land via which each property has access to Fullers Rd. > > cheers > Tom > ---- > Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning > Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
