Thanks, mate! Graeme
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 16:51, stevea <[email protected]> wrote: > I deleted what appeared to be the superfluous way (which indeed WAS part > of the relation). However, “Route 754” (relation/10974127) seems to need > some additional “role” tags (forward, backward). I’ve edited hundreds, > maybe thousands of routes (bus, bike, road, rail…) but as I’m a > right-hand-drive Yank and don’t know the route or local area, I defer to > others to tidy this up to perfection. But it is a bit better than it was > five minutes ago. > > SteveA > > > On Jan 2, 2022, at 10:37 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Been looking at OSM Inspector & it is showing an error on a near-by > street: > > > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=791590032#map=18/-28.08609/153.42409 > > > > The error is being reported as a "Way without tags". > > > > I can see a line there, which appears to be a duplicate of Christine > Ave?, but no tags. It's tied into a bus route relation & I don't want to > stuff around with it, not knowing enough (anything!) about how relations > work. > > > > Is anybody please able to check it? > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
