This is nonetheless correct mapping!
What you are seeing it the resulting impedance mismatch from using linear ways to map what on the ground are actually areas. That sort segment at a sharp angle only exists for connectivity purposes. And the data makes perfect sense when seen in the context of all tagging around it. Please look at this: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/558999688670609448/949539833217429524/unknown.png as you can see from the dotted outer lines on that “connectivity” way, it’s tagged as placement=transition That tells any data consumer that wants to care about it that the position of the way does not actually reflect a fixed relation to the area of the way. >From the available data, a data consumer can derive the information that the >actual “per lane” connectivity and lane area follows the line that I drew in >red. As I’ve said before. OSM is not a map. It’s a geospatial database. A data consumer that wants to draw a map is able to derive the necessary information from the totality of geometry and tags used. Cheers, Thorsten From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, 5 March 2022 15:04 To: Dian Ågesson <[email protected]> Cc: OSM Australian Talk List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 at 13:53, Dian Ågesson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Hello, Things have escalated somewhat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118091243 Yeah, we now have the situation where turn left slip lanes have been mapped as sudden sharp angles, rather than gradual turns, which just looks wrong! https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=118091243#map=20/-38.04993/145.29852 Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
