Looking at the note and the imagery I would say it's definitely

lanes=4 (if no one was parked there then you could use all 4 lanes for
driving)
psv:lanes=designated|yes|yes|yes ("Bus Lane")
access:lanes=no|yes|yes|yes (you can't use the left lane, unless you are a
psv)

parking:lane:right=parallel (parallel parking is available on the right
side of the road)
paring:lane:right:parallel=on_street (per the wiki "As a rule of thumb, if
the parking cars are on the part of the road that is traversible, i.e. that
could and would otherwise be used by traffic, it is parking on_street. If
not, it is parking street_side.")
parking:condition:right:conditional=ticket @ (Mo-Fr 08:00-22:00;Sa-Su,PH
08:00-22:00) (you need a ticket to park here during those times
parking:condition:right=free (free parking, except for those times listed
in the conditional)
parking:condition:right:maxstay:conditional=2 hours @ (Mo-Fr 08:00-18:00);
4 hours @ (Mo-Fr 18:00-22:00; Sa-Su,PH 08:00-22:00)

I think we need an additional tag to say the parking described in
parking:lane:right is part of the lane count.

I don't know how we could tag the special event clearway as obviously we
can't tag the specific times they apply because they are so variable and
ever changing, we probably need a new tag to simply say it's designated as
a clearway for special events only. We should tag this, just not sure
exactly how.

Where did you find the wiki suggesting lanes:conditional?

On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 19:18, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a note on Chalmers St:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2551595
>
> where the question was how many lanes does this road have?
>
> Normally I'd say:
>
> lanes=3
> lanes:conditional=2 @ (....)
>
> the wiki suggests:
>
> lanes=4
> lanes:conditional=3 @ (....);2 @ (....)
>
> because it wants to count the special event clearway. Now the problem is
> that I don't know what to put in as a condition for 3 @ (....) as it is
> arbitrary ie: whenever someone decides to type something into the system.
>
> Do people have an opinion about which option to use:
>
> lanes=3 ... and ignore the clearway
> lanes=4 ... and come up with something for the condition
>
> or
>
> lanes=3 and use the same condition for 4 @ (....) with the idea that if
> the condition can't be parsed at least it will default to 3.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to