On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 07:17, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't. The thought was based on how people were tagging other > variable lane counts: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gSc Yeah and I think that's correct for reversible/tidal flow lanes where the lane count in either direction or even in one direction changes throughout the day where they open/close lanes on a schedule. I've used lanes:conditional along with lanes:forward:conditional/lanes:backward:conditional for this myself. Maybe I am overthinking it. If you go with what the wiki says, then > lanes=* is just a literal count of how many lanes are painted on the > ground regardless of how often you can use them. > Yeah I think that's the way to do it, though for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252133052#map=18/-33.89141/151.20767 you can see on the imagery the western side of the road has much shorter dotted lines so likely this lane is only for parking and not meant for regular traffic flow, in which case it wouldn't be included in the lane count in my opinion. In contrast to the road from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2551595 where it's painted as a regular lane and is used as a regular lane during special events so it's a full traffic flow lane but mostly used for parking.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
