On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 08:15, Tom Brennan <webs...@ozultimate.com> wrote:
> > natural=point only has some ~400 uses world wide, no wiki page so .. low > > uses = no rendering. Choosing one of the additional tags will get > > rendering .. but it should be appropriate to the feature not just > > 'tagging for the render' > > So from a long term perspective, is it better to just keep marking them > as "natural=point", and once there is a critical mass, pushing for > rendering? I'm not really clear on whether tags are supposed to be > defined first, or if it's just based on use. > > I'm not particularly fussed about whether or not they are rendered in > the map. Rather, I'd like to see them in the data, in the most > appropriate way. > Agreed, natural=point seems good. You can just start using the tag, though is good if we can at some point create a wiki page, even better if we can push it through a tagging proposal.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
