On 23/10/22 21:46, Phil Wyatt wrote:
Hi Warin,
Both of those examples were previously build:part=elevator. Its probably
worth asking why they changed them to building:levels=elevator. That seems
to be a more appropriate tagging.
building:part should be a 'part' of a building .. not the entire
building .. they are both tagged with building=yes.
One example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996164524/history
has no past history .. so no previous key of building:part.
I'd have no problem with building=elevator_shell, but they are
building=yes. I am happy to change that too, if acceptable?
I have been using building=silo with man_made=silo (key building for
rendering the area .. man_made just does a symbol).
Cheers - Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Warin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2022 8:41 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List <[email protected]>
Subject: [talk-au] Changing building levels elevator to description elevator
shell
Hi
There are ~260 of closed ways with the tag 'building:levels=elevator'.
This tag should have numbers as the value not text, the number being the
number of levels.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels.
These object all are associated with railway stations around Sydney and
appear to have been added by members of TfNSW team. I have left a message on
one of their members changeset but have had no reply.
There are no other uses of this tag elsewhere in the world.
My thoughts are to change the tag to 'description=elevator shell' as these
look to be the walls around the outside of the moving elevator that is
presently mapped as a node in these cases.
Examples
Way 993829900 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900
Way 996164524 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996164524
Any thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
