On 24/10/22 17:16, Phil Wyatt wrote:
Many thanks Sigurjon
I don’t suppose you have accessibility data as well? That would be
great to know as well.
* wheelchair=yes/no – suitable for wheelchairs?
They were put in for things like wheelchairs.. so yes they take
wheelchairs, and prams and bicycles
*
* tactile_writing:braille:lg=yes/no?
I'll have a look next time .. but I think they have tactile things on
the buttons too..
*
Cheers - Phil
*From:*Sigurjón Gísli Rúnarsson <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, 24 October 2022 3:37 PM
*To:* Warin <[email protected]>
*Cc:* Phil Wyatt <[email protected]>; OSM Australian Talk List
<[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Changing building levels elevator to
description elevator shell
Hi Warin,
Apologies for not getting back to you and acting on this.
We will revisit all these locations and update in the coming days.
Below is how we plan to tag the two typical scenarios:
*inside a building *
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900>
highway=elevator
The highway=elevator already exists within these ways as a single node.
See example 2 below .. where someone has used it like this.
building:levels=2
That would mean it only is on building level 2.. and it would not go
from another building level.
indoor=room
That would mean it is within a larger building...
room=elevator
For pedestrian navigation the highway=elevator as a single node and the
connected highway=footway should work..
Indoor mapping is not my thing .. I don't think many here have tried it.
Some examples may help?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/281120247
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350884415 note here the duplication
using https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3566114780 and the node is what
the footways connect to.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3446811813
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/534454027
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4037948794
*outside building (stand alone) *
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993533793
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993533793>
highway=elevator
building:levels=3
building:yes
description=elevator shell
That would mean it only is on building level 3.. and it would not go
to/from another building level.
Please let me know if you are not happy with this approach.
Regards,
Sigurjon
TfNSW
On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 22:27, Warin <[email protected]> wrote:
On 23/10/22 21:46, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Hi Warin,
>
> Both of those examples were previously build:part=elevator. Its
probably
> worth asking why they changed them to building:levels=elevator.
That seems
> to be a more appropriate tagging.
building:part should be a 'part' of a building .. not the entire
building .. they are both tagged with building=yes.
One example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996164524/history
has no past history .. so no previous key of building:part.
I'd have no problem with building=elevator_shell, but they are
building=yes. I am happy to change that too, if acceptable?
I have been using building=silo with man_made=silo (key building for
rendering the area .. man_made just does a symbol).
>
> Cheers - Phil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warin <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2022 8:41 PM
> To: OSM Australian Talk List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [talk-au] Changing building levels elevator to
description elevator
> shell
>
> Hi
>
> There are ~260 of closed ways with the tag
'building:levels=elevator'.
>
> This tag should have numbers as the value not text, the number
being the
> number of levels.
>
> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels.
>
>
> These object all are associated with railway stations around
Sydney and
> appear to have been added by members of TfNSW team. I have left
a message on
> one of their members changeset but have had no reply.
>
> There are no other uses of this tag elsewhere in the world.
>
>
> My thoughts are to change the tag to 'description=elevator
shell' as these
> look to be the walls around the outside of the moving elevator
that is
> presently mapped as a node in these cases.
>
>
> Examples
>
> Way 993829900 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900
>
> Way 996164524 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996164524
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
