On 27 Feb 2023, at 9:05 am, Tom Brennan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sounds like the general consensus is:
> - Strava heatmap is good for aligning *existing* tracks
> - Strava shouldn't be used for the creation of new tracks without some ground 
> truthing.

Hi all, nice discussion. I agree but would broaden the 2nd point. The focus for 
the thread was walking tracks (paths etc in OSM). For vehicle tracks (fire 
trails etc), there’s not always a need to compare Strava against ground 
truthing (great though this would be) and careful inspection of imagery may 
often suffice. OSM’s vehicle tracks / fire trails are incomplete (or absent) in 
many areas, and Strava’s heat map is a great way to prioritise mapping of well 
used tracks using imagery, using the same care as all other mapping from 
imagery. So, I’d suggest broadening the 2nd point to ‘… without ground truthing 
or careful inspection of imagery, where appropriate”.  Cheers Ian
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to