On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 14:05, OSM via Talk-au <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since the coastline tag is also supposed to represent the high water mark > then I would say that they should be snapped together (since they then > represent the same feature - that is, the high water mark). This would mean > that the boundary data already in OSM from the government basemaps would > just be their own mapping of the high water mark, and probably be less up > to date or refined as our own. > Exactly. So if anything we should be actively snapping them. > This is my first time responding on talk-au, lmk if I've messed up any > formatting to link to the original question. > It's come through but as a new thread, and for some reason from talk-au instead of from you and via talk-au.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
