On 29/3/23 14:30, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 14:05, OSM via Talk-au
<[email protected]> wrote:
Since the coastline tag is also supposed to represent the high
water mark then I would say that they should be snapped together
(since they then represent the same feature - that is, the high
water mark). This would mean that the boundary data already in OSM
from the government basemaps would just be their own mapping of
the high water mark, and probably be less up to date or refined as
our own.
Exactly. So if anything we should be actively snapping them.
Are there any links to these boundaries linked to the high water mark???
I would have though that CAPAD data would be accurate as it should come
from the National Parks people using the gazette.
My trove searches only turned up low water mark stuff - but I only
looked in NSW.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
