Sure thing Tony. That's one of the questions I've got for him when he gets back.
Thanks Graeme On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 16:19, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Graeme > > I have been attempting to set up a dialogue between Parks Victoria and > OSM, so far unsuccessfully. I think its a step forward if NWPS wants > to liaise with a Liaison Officer. I would give them a Liaison Officer > and at the same time encourage them into the community. The OSM > Liaison Officer would explain to NWPS that OSM is a community and > mentor them into the community. > > Graeme, please find out whether their contact person is representing a > region or all of NWPS. If appropriate, can you give me their contact > info, either on or off list. I would like to talk to them and see if > it helps get Parks Victoria to appoint a Liaison Officer. > > Tony Forster > Friends of Lysterfield Park > > > > Thanks everybody for your thoughts. > > > > As per Steve's comment, here is probably the easiest contact point due to > > not needing an account, but we'll see what other suggestions are made? > > > > I was wondering if a general OSM-AU / OSM-Oceania e-mail address, > probably > > as part of OSGeo, would help with this sort of thing? > > > > Anyway, my message back to him for further details came back with an OOO > > till 21/11 (his query was from a few weeks ago) so we have some time to > > discuss it! > > > > His address also listed him being at Coffs Harbour, so I don't know if > he's > > asking on a regional basis onl, or if that may be a main office? > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme > > > > > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 14:48, Ben Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> In the context of the tracks, there is always the risk that if you > delete > >> something that you don't think should be there, that someone else > re-maps > >> it because they see it in the aerial photo. (As we discussed.) > >> > >> I guess the best is that we could detail a preferred approach (e.g. in > >> Australian tagging guidelines). I think it's clear that there are a > number > >> of views on this though. > >> > >> Then at least if something happens that differs from the preferred > >> approach, it makes it clearer whether a revert is justified. > >> > >> - Ben. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 14:57, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> DWG have received a > >>> "*Request for a Liaison Officer*: > >>> To enhance the accuracy of OpenStreetMap data pertaining to the NSW > >>> National Parks and Wildlife Service" > >>> > >>> This has come up in regard to tracks that they say they have previously > >>> requested be deleted (I'm contacting them to confirm just which?) > >>> > >>> What would be the easiest way for them to contact us with questions > like > >>> this - here / Forum / Discord? > >>> > >>> Question posed in all three places > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Graeme > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-au mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > >> > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
