This collection looks to be operated by the same firm .. but each site
has a different name ... and different facilities...
See
https://reflectionsholidays.com.au/parks/wee-jasper/accommodation/?type=unpowered-sites
And https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1811175182
So I'd delete the site relation, put the operator tags on each campsite.
Probably a web tag to the individual campsites - eg
https://reflectionsholidays.com.au/parks/wee-jasper/accommodation/fitzpatrick-trackhead-reserve/
On 14/7/24 14:58, Alex Sims wrote:
I’m not an expert but I had a look at the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site#Alternatives and it
points to a multipolygon relation of a series of “outer” elements. At
the moment the relation is a collection of nodes, but really they are
areas, possibly not well defined, but certainly large enough to put a
tent up in. I’d be changing the nodes to areas which would make sense
and then a multipolygon to join them all together. I note also that
there is poor downstream support for a “site” relation.
Alex
*From: *Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>
*Date: *Sunday, 14 July 2024 at 12:55 pm
*To: *OSM-Au <[email protected]>
*Subject: *[talk-au] Checking on site relation
Could one of our relation experts please have a look at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17833891#map=13/-35.1636/148.6804
to see if I've done it properly?
It relates to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4266915 where 4
separately named campgrounds are all linked together under 1 overall name.
Thanks
Graeme
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
