On 15/7/24 12:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at 14:58, Alex Sims <[email protected]> wrote:
At the moment the relation is a collection of nodes, but really
they are areas, possibly not well defined, but certainly large
enough to put a tent up in. I’d be changing the nodes to areas
which would make sense and then a multipolygon to join them all
together.
Thanks, Alex
I thought about areas as well, but they aren't defined, so thought
that may be messy?
& will an MP work when the 4 sites are spread over several km?
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at 18:09, Warin <[email protected]> wrote:
This collection looks to be operated by the same firm .. but each
site has a different name ... and different facilities...
So I'd delete the site relation, put the operator tags on each
campsite.
Yes, but while each individual site has its own name, the 4 of them
together make up "Wee Jasper Campground", so that should be shown
somewhere, shouldn't it?
I think that the 4 together make up[ the 'Wee Jasper CampgroundS' ...
Quote "There are few places left as naturally and untouched as
Reflections Wee Jasper campgrounds" ..
Yes I know they use "Wee Jasper Campground" as well ... but logic
suggests campgrounds as there are more than one campground, the
collection is geographic and administrative.
The NSW state government calls them 'Wee Jasper Reserves'
https://www.nsw.gov.au/visiting-and-exploring-nsw/locations-and-attractions/wee-jasper-reserves
I do think these are council properties with a 'commercial' interest
handling it for the local council.. thus an operator.
By using the tag 'name' in the relation the individual member get that
name .. but thye each already have a name .. catch 22.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
