Hi Daniel, It's too earlier for such detail... but let's go with a rudimentary set of propertirs like road width information, camber, gradient... e.t.c...
Cheers AH On Tue, 3 Sept 2024, 7:56 pm Daniel O'Connor, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, to get a feel for the data available, do you have a bit of a > schema or example? > > OSM way IDs might not be super stable, but others - say mapillary and > openstreetcam - have added adjacent information by publishing geojson with > a bit of geometry (points, or lines for traces) which has a lot of extra > detail. > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024, 5:01 PM Andrew Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> At the NHVR, we are collecting a lot of information about the >> road/transport network that doesn't belong in OSM (just like the info on >> wikipedia and wikidata) does not either. Typically, these are way's but >> there are many other examples that are likely to be a reality in time. >> >> Given that we only have information relevant certain ways, we would >> like to tag these specific ways to indicate that we have extra information >> about them. >> >> I am completely open to suggestions at this point, but based on: >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website >> or possibly >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url >> >> I am thinking that something like... >> >> website:nhvr=https://maps.nhvr.gov.au/somethinggoeshere/abc123 >> >> Could be used to link the way(s) that are relevant to the information we >> have about them. >> >> Please let me know what you think. >> >> Cheers, >> Andrew >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
