Andre Engels wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Renaud MICHEL <r.h.michel+...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On mardi 22 mars 2011 at 18:39, Jo wrote : > >> cycleway=opposite (converted to the proper xml-format) and tag the way > >> as modified. > > > > I don't think that tag is appropriate. > > It implies that there is a real cycleway on the road, but in Liege (and > > many other places in wallonia) you simply have an exclusion to the > > oneway for bicycles. > > No, cycleway=opposite means exactly that - a one way road that > cyclists are allowed to ride in the opposite direction. See > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
The main problem with it is that it doesn't tell anything about mopeds. As you know many oneway streets also allow mopeds class A in the opposite direction. My preference has always gone to bicycle:oneway=no moped_A:oneway=no and I'm sure that the reasoning why I choose this and not oneway:bicycle=no can be found in a couple of places in different discussions in mailing lists and wiki, but I'm not gonna dig those up now. My unfinished traffic signs tool also makes use of these: http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~eimai/verkeersborden/ Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
