There are two things wrong:
- The antenna at the site of BIPT is placed not on the roof of the building but above the white tent / parasol of the terrace (See their Google map with satelite view).
(Are the antennas in front of the building against the wall?)
- The street before the cafe in OSM is running through this terrace (see Bing sattelite view).
(The way is not actualy a street but the border of the market place)
the actual street should be located more south-west.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/91685551
Why do you convert the location in degrees, minutes and seconds as the BIPT site has already 2 formats?
Coordonnées: 3.95292 E / 50.45506 N
Lambert: X: 120473 / Y: 127218 m
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.45506&mlon=3.95292&zoom=18
Seems the same location as on BIPT.
Regards,
Gerard.

Linusable wrote:

I have tried a few times this converter website :
the world coordinate converter <http://twcc.free.fr/>
From my point of view, it's OK, at least for the geodetic points i tested. It could be interesting to discuss and chek some original data for a few antenna, like the one i mentionned on the cafe 'Le Central', grand place of Mons,

I have seen on the website of IBPT: http://www.sites.ibpt.be/ that the position 3° 57' 10.5" E / 50° 27' 18.2" N for the above mentionned point was also a few meters on the grand place, with the google images

Regards,
Linusable

Le 23/04/11 15:47, Ben Abelshausen a écrit :

It is possible the coordinate conversion was not very accurate but the source data was. I had some problems before converting Lambert coordinates and got about the same deviations.

Regards,

Ben

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Linus Able <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello everybody, Hello Pol,

    i should want to question the accuracy of the data. I have seen
    (before Pol deleted the data) one of the antenna points on the
    (openstreetmap) Grand-Place de Mons, in JOSM, with Bing aerial as
    background. The point is café Le Central, at the corner of Grand
    Place with rue de Nimy.  I suppose the Antenna is on the roof,
    but it appeared a few meters on the Grand Place, with a
    difference of about 5-10m compare to the Bing images.

    What is wrong (or imprecise)  : antenna coordinates or Bing
position ?
    In order to investigate Bing positionning around Mons, I checked
    against a geodetic point from ign/ngi (www.ngi.be
    <http://www.ngi.be>), using Fiche Planimétrique45D06C1, with a
    survey point at position N 50.47149281234526 E 4.028218331187543
    (Obourg). It seems that the error is less than 1-2 meters.
My naive first conclusion is that the accuracy of the antenna
    positions could be quite poor, specially in dense area (towns or
    cities). This could result to absurd situations like antenna on
    streets.

    Maybe it could be interesting to use a script to analyse distance
    of antenna (from the data files) with nearest streets ?  or
    another standard procedure ?

    Regards,

    Linusable

    Le 22/04/11 16:33, Pol a écrit :

    I deleted them this morning and as long as the situation is not
    clear.

    -φol d.-



    On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:22, Gerard Vanderveken <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I was looking up some on the map, but it seems that
        tower:type = communications is not rendered anymore???
        I tought they were before, altough only in Osmarender, cfr
        VRT radio and tv towers in Overijse - Wavre.

        I see some have a name, but I'm affraid that it won't add
        much, but instead duplicating and cluthering the rendering
        and names of the current places (buildings like churches etc)
        http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7911333
        Some has also very generic names eg. watertoren, kerk,  etc

        There is a Wiki about GSM in the Belgian project
        
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Mapping_resources#GSM.2FUMTS_antenna_sites

        Should the points not to be deleted, until the status about
        their use becomes clear??
        For the moment it is obvious that it is forbidden data.

        Regards,
        Gerard.

        Pol wrote:

        Hello,

        I contacted them this morning and they asked me to write
        down a mail explaining the request, why, etc etc etc.
        That's what I did. If you want a copy of the mail (in
        french), just contact me in private.

        They told me that they will forward the mail to their law
        departement and I should expect an answer next week.

        Let's cross our fingers ! ;) I'll keep you updated of the
        situation !

        By the way, I'll be at the hackdemocracy this Thursday,
        April 28,
        2011: http://www.meetup.com/HackDemocracy/events/17010026/

        Have a nice day all.

        -φol d.-


        On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 22:14, Pol <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hello,

            Someone forwarded me the mail from Lennard talking
            about the revert or not of my commit.
            I wasn't aware of the existence of that mailing list
            until now.

            Let me explain to all of you how it all began...

            One year ago I was looking, for personal purpose, the
            coordinates of each cell phones antennas in Belgium.

            The first site I found was: http://www.antennes-gsm.be/
            But that one seems to be old and no more maintained.

            Then I found the one of IBPT: http://www.sites.ibpt.be/

            The one you are currently seeing at this address is the
            new version.
            When I first found it, they were using an old version.

            By doing some searches, I found a huge security hole in it.
            I was unemployed at that time and I decided to make an
            exploit.
            The exploit was simple, using HTML and JavaScript, I
            could manipulate their databases by sending custom queries.
            I'm not a kid and I'm someone who destroy someone
            else's work, so I contacted them and explained the problem.
            The reaction was fast, some days later I was in their
            offices with my laptop, showing them the problem and
            the possible solutions.
            I also made a new local proof of concept that it could
            be done in a nicer and cleaner way.
            Unfortunately, they were really kind and say thanks but
            we do not rely on our team to do the map, we rely on
            another company and we cannot break the current
            contract with them.
            Before leaving, I asked to the head of security if it
            was possible to get a dump of the antennas coordinates
            in a more easy way to put it on OpenStreetMap and he
            said that it couldn't be done: "Imaginez ce que
            pourrait faire qqun de mal intentionné s'il trouve ces
            données!" which means: "Imagine what could do someone
            malicious if they finds these datas!".
            Which is completely a non sense because those datas can
            be retrieved from THEIR online website.
            I said him that ! Someone could spot by himself all the
            antennas and put them on OpenStreetMap. He didn't reply
            to that one.
            So, I leaved, quite sad.

            Some month later, the current new system was in place
            and the security hole vanished, problem solved.

            With the new system, it's even easier to get their datas.
            I decided to save in a file all the data I could get
            from their map in a file and submit it to OpenStreetMap.

            That's the end of the story.

            It's up to you now to decide if you want to remove them
            or not.
            If you have questions, I'll reply to them on that
            mailing list.

            Nice evening all.

            -φol d.-


------------------------------------------------------------------------
        _______________________________________________ Talk-be
        mailing list [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


        _______________________________________________
        Talk-be mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be



_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


    _______________________________________________
    Talk-be mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be



_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to