Hi,
The guy split a outer-way into two parts, convert one parts to a road,
and did not add the old part to the multipolygon. So, this was not
closed any more.
I did my best : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14524952
It seems ok now (http://analyser.openstreetmap.fr/cgi-bin/index.py -
relation id : 49588) although it does not appears on the mapnik layer
(OpenMapquest does)
I am going to write to llnoxll this afternoon.
Julien
Le 04/01/13 13:22, Ben Laenen a écrit :
On Friday 04 January 2013 13:09:02 Jan-willem De Bleser wrote:
Just keep an eye on them, as Julien has done, and teach the new users about
relations as needed. The larger multipolygon is a more accurate
representation, as long as we don't have a proper area data type.
It's not really more accurate, as we don't have a one to one mapping from real
life objects to OSM objects. Our roads for example are also often split up
into many pieces. And by breaking up a huge object into manageable parts you
can more easily repair it when someone does something wrong, which still
matters because we don't have a review process so we can intervene before the
bad edit is uploaded.
Ben
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
