|
On 2014-07-03 21:20, Stijn Rombauts
wrote :
Nice to meet you. Following OSM practices: route=hiking: 49K route=foot: 23K, so I'd go for increasing hiking. Random picking in Wallonia is balanced, contagiously. Would you all mind changing the wiki page to hiking? But please don't change other contributors' tagging needlessly. Suggest. In principle, we should disregard law-breakers and not be accomplices. The problem is that 33 is not official at all and, with possibly several 33, not even a reference number. Just as if everyone chose his car plate number and were surprised to receive other persons' fines. The problem is that when the CGT writes to the municipalities, only half reply. In the case TE10 is referred locally as 30, getting them disciplined would be never ending doing their job. A compromise would be to pick TE from CGT and 30 from local and make it TE30. But that would be yet another ugly system. The best, regular way I see is, because they don't care for a reference number and only we and the CGT do, is to use their ID in the name (or posts) as they do TE10=30 Chicheux (as displayed on their site) and SOD05=Moulin des 3 ponts A4 (as in their listings and on the CGT itself) As I said, let's call them as they call them. Ben:Just click and read "1,053,692 members ... sharing 2,218,542 trails" (1G can't be wrong ;-) ) It is a great source of often quality tracks, firstly to provide missing signed ones... OK, but does that really mean that in regions where no one cares to signpost hikes and where those WL people find very nice ones, OSM would be forbidden to do what they're allowed to do? Avoiding overcrowding areas where already enough hikes exist should be a better OSM.be rule IMHO. Good idea, but that's a howto. What I has in mind is a hint where to find the symbol of certain hikes. See below... Maybe, but what does it do? As often, Key:colour is gibberish. "indicate the official color associated with the object" is nonsense to me. Here is below (Below is here) ;-) How in Wallonia, with only 4 plain color icons as I can see since 2007, can we distinguish hikes by icon? I know the Four color theorem, but I'd bet they don't and it's irrelevant ;-) I have filed Waymarked issue 190 suggesting that the map could display both icon and ID/ref. Isn't it particularly appropriate in this case? Your opinion? Cheers,
|
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
