André, my apologies for using the word "rambling", due my limited knowledge of English, I couldn't come up with a better word.
I first wanted to write a long answer, but eventually I decided to spend my time in a more interesting way, by mapping lanes & turn:lanes bye, m On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:13 AM, André Pirard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014-07-04 16:02, Marc Gemis wrote : > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:46 PM, André Pirard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 2014-07-04 15:00, Marc Gemis wrote : > > about which multicolored icons are you rambling ? > > Can't you really open the hiking map, look at the osmc icons and compare > with "le balisage normalisé"? > > André. > > > which hiking map ? http://www.wanderreitkarte.de/ ? > http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ ? another one ? > e.g. waymarkedtrails aka lonvia is using it's own color scheme. It > ignores all colors / icons set on the relation. Do you really think all the > walking networks in Flanders are marked with orange signs ? > > As far as I know there is no . So when you rely on Dutch or German people > the chances are small that they stick to the conventions of "le balisage > normalisé" ( > http://www.sentiers.be/comprendre-les-chemins-et-sentiers/la-signaletique-et-le-balisage/le-balisage-normalise/ > ) > > > Rambling ??? Who is? > Please notice that the subject of this thread is Wallonia and that it > quite logically deals with Wallonia. > (and that orange signs are officially obsolete and deprecated since 1830 > ;-)) > > Display the best waymarkedtrails like this > <http://www.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=13&lat=50.53749&lon=5.56839> and > see OSMC symbols on the map and under *Routes* like this: > > ES01. Esneux - Promenade des artistes (Ham) ES01v - Ham variante ES02. > Esneux - Le Tige de Fontin ES03. Esneux - Autour d'Avionpuits ES04. > Esneux - Chemin des Carrières ES05. Esneux - Boucle de l'Ourthe (Ham) > ES06. > Esneux - Circuit de la Roche-aux-Faucons ES07 - Esneux - Parc du Mary, > Heid des Corbeaux et Tessenire ES08 - Esneux - Rond Bâti SPR05 > Sprimont 5: Tultay SPR06 Sprimont 6: Gomzé SPR07 Sprimont 7: > Dolembreux ... > ... > Typical tags: > website : http://www.ourthe-ambleve.be/insitu/fiche.php?lang=fr&cle=8053 > name : ES06. Esneux - Circuit de la Roche-aux-Faucons roundtrip : yes > type : route route : hiking network : lwn oneway : yes operator : SI > Esneux ref : ES06 osmc:symbol : yellow:yellow:yellow_rectangle:6:black > > Other locations outside Wallonia show *Routes* like this: > > > (1563591) > 91-92 (1563607) > 99-123 (1563608) > 97-99 (1570051) > 99-197 ... > Typical tag: > note : 90-165 network:name : Rivierenland route : foot type : route > network : rwn > > osmc:symbol <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol>=* is > not peculiar to any map renderer. The symbol icons are visible only on > those that implement it indeed. Contrary to what you say, > hiking.waymarkedtrails.org > <http://www.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=13&lat=50.55297&lon=5.92837> is > one that does and it suffices to open their site and look at the German, > ... and the few Walloon hikes to see it. > > What does that "Belgian making a hiking map" mean? Who are those sticking > Dutch and Germans? > Let us speak a precise language please. Walloon hikes are chosen a symbol > by their organizers (operator ...). The mapper uses the corresponding osmc > symbol tag. The renderer renders that tag. I just can't see what the > Belgian, Dutch or German rambling has to do with that. > > An issue is that since 2007-2012 only 4 plain color symbols are legal in > Wallonia but that > > - OSM symbols, and even hike websites, continue to use other symbols > - the sites do not use the official ref but some ID of their own > - and the probability to "officially" jump from RED 3 of municipality > A to RED 3 of municipality B now becomes significant > > So please bark at the right tree. If you don't agree with a rendering, > complain to the people that made the map. File a bug report, send an email, > whatever. We, ordinary mappers, cannot influence the color if they ignore > the tags. > > Again, what is that barking about rendering problem, what is "people who > made the map", what bug report? > We, ordinary mappers, do define the symbol colors if we tag osmc. > We, ordinary mappers, should try to use the legal symbol if signing is as > important as you say. > We, ordinary mappers, should try to use the official ref but when I do > StijnRR removes it whimsically. > We, ordinary mappers, should try to convince renderers to display both > official ref and unofficial ID. For that point you're right about sending > an email and filing a bug report, but I really wonder why you say it > because it's one thing that I've done already. > Your rambling doesn't make any sense. > > André. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
