On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Sander Deryckere <[email protected]> wrote:
> I also think that destination information on motorways is nice, but not > completely neccesary. OsmAnd nicely tells you on which lane to drive, and > does this just by counting lane numbers (nothing fancy like joining to the > right or left tags, or direction tags needed). It just knows that when you > have a 4-lane motorway, and after a node, you have a 3-lane motoway and a > 1-lane motorway-link to the right, you should drive on that rightmost lane. > And the driving experience already gets pretty nice when knowing the lane. > There are some exceptions to this rule. When you have 3 lanes and the turn lanes are through|through;slight_right|slight_right, ie. middle lane can be used for both directions. So you go from a three lane two 2-lanes. Does simple lane counting still works in this case ? The exit on the Ring around Antwerp (coming form the North) towards A12 and E19 is now like that. While knowing the right lane is the most important thing, I guess that GPS makers do not want to go "back" to a system where they cannot display destinations if they currently have a system with it. So I believe that when OSM wants to compete, we need to add that data. After adding a few hundreds of turn:lanes, it becomes quite readable :-) regards m
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
