Well, that was covered as well in my full copy/paste
access:conditional=yes @ permit_holder bicycle=yes description=Jaagpad highway=track mofa=yes source=survey surface=unpaved tracktype=grade2 traffic_sign=BE:C3,BE:Type-IV vehicle=no website=http://www.wenz.be/nl/burger/Jaagpaden/ It's a one on one with what I see on that location: > https://plus.google.com/photos/101291905535513785025/albums/6019150774027442577?banner=pwa It concerns the 'left' side looking at the Zenne. Still doubts? Let me know, I've thought about this one a lot and we had a discussion about this before and this is what I came up with after taking in consideration all the input I got back then on this list. Glenn On 07-12-14 11:44, Sander Deryckere wrote: > But vehicle= is more specific than access=. This holds even for tags > extended with conditionals (else the bicycles would need a permit). > > So, since a car is a vehicle, it would have not access at all. > > 2014-12-07 11:12 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be > <mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be>>: > > No, "Met vergunning", than the best choice is what I suggested and it's > legit OSM tagging: > > access:conditional=yes @ permit_holder > > It covers it all. Simple, elegant and readable. Permissive doesn't > cover it. > > I haven't seen service=towpath being used on a jaagpad yet, but that > kind of makes sense as in the whole of OSM, this combination has been > used 0 times. Better not invent new tagging' schemes I believe. > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service#values > > > Glenn > > > On 07-12-14 11:01, Jakka wrote: > >> highway=service > >> service=towpath > >> access=private > > > > > > jaagpaden tekst vermeld met nadruk "met vergunning" > > acces= permissive > > nederlandse item keuze "Algemene toegang=met vergunning" > > of zou deze service=towpath te niet doen? > > > >> bicycle=yes > >> foot=yes > >> surface=asphatl/earth/ > >> maxspeed=30 > > > > Marc Gemis schreef op 7/12/2014 om 8:19: > >> This topic pops up from time to time, see e.g. > >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-July/004376.html > >> . Don't remember the outcome, besides that they are not cycleways > and do > >> not have names in general. > >> > >> If I would start completely afresh I would propose: > >> highway=service > >> service=towpath > >> access=private > >> bicycle=yes > >> foot=yes > >> surface=asphatl/earth/ > >> maxspeed=30 > >> > >> In some cases the access might be more "open", such as destination or > >> even "yes". > >> > >> m > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jakka > >> <vdmfrank...@gmail.com <mailto:vdmfrank...@gmail.com> > >> <mailto:vdmfrank...@gmail.com <mailto:vdmfrank...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> "jachtpaden" near the "Leie" "Schelde" "Albert Kanaal"enz... are > >> tagged as "cycleway" but in serveye there is no sign > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/NL:Cycleway > >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway> > >> http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Fietspad > >> <http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fietspad> > >> And the owner of those ways says: > >> http://www.descheepvaart.be/__Rubriek/Recreatie/Jaagpaden.__aspx > >> <http://www.descheepvaart.be/Rubriek/Recreatie/Jaagpaden.aspx> > >> What would be the correct tag? > >> > >> Jakka > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-be mailing list > > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > -- > "Everything is going to be 200 OK." > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > -- "Everything is going to be 200 OK." _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
