Sorry maar als ik in het Engels zou proberen antwoorden verstaat waarschijnlijk 
niemand wat ik bedoel.

Het is frustrerend om telkens opnieuw dingen te moeten wijzigen. Zo heb ik 
destijds in de wijde omgeving alle verharde wegen die gemapt waren als track, 
gewijzigd in unclassified. Ik veronderstelde dat die wegen inderdaad nog 
onverhard waren toen ze gemapt werden maar bij een verkaveling kregen ze twee 
betonstroken met daartussen (meestal) gras of gras in beton. Nu zie ik dat 
'iemand' ze weer al track gemapt heeft....en zo blijven we bezig terwijl er nog 
zoveel nuttige dingen te doen zijn. Ook trackgrade is een mengelmoes van 
meningen. Maar ik vrees dat deze discutie ook weer geen uitsluitsel zal 
brengen. 

Guy Vanvuchelen

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Ben Laenen [mailto:[email protected]] 
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 december 2015 17:59
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] tagging conventions

I'm sure you can look through this mailing list's history and find all kinds of 
discussion about it in the past...

Long story short: the unpaved thing was more or less the original usage, then 
it was changed in some other countries which was set as the international 
definition and in Belgium we didn't change it.

Personally I think the difference unpaved <-> paved for track <-> other road 
types makes much more sense in Belgium, and also much more objective.

Ben


On Tuesday 22 December 2015 08:37:35 joost schouppe wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I was looking at this page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Hig
> hways
> 
> And I saw only unpaved roads are supposed to be tagged as track. I've 
> been seeing quite a few rural roads which only allow agricultural 
> vehicles and only lead to fields. They look to me essentially as paved 
> tracks. In most of the world (i.e. outside of Europe) what the road is 
> used for trumps road quality when it comes to classification.
> 
> Shouldn't this "Unpaved roads with traces of motor traffic or 
> accessible to motor traffic" be replaced by something like "Paths 
> which show use of occasional motor traffic, or are designed to do so 
> and that don't prohibit such use. Generally unpaved and used to access 
> forests or agricultural fields."


_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to