Mathieu, what you did is what Seppe is suggesting to do in Ghent, if I understand correctly.
In Brussels you have both areas and lines. The routing uses the lines. In Ghent, in a lot of places, the lines were removed. Op 24-feb.-2016 13:09 schreef "Matthieu Gaillet" <[email protected]>: > I mapped the pedestrian area in Brussels using areas and the autorouter > seems quite happy with them : have a look : > http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=50.8472%2C4.3403%3B50.8508%2C4.3524#map=15/50.8500/4.3532 > > Or did I miss your point ? > > Matthieu (sur iMobile) > > Le 18 févr. 2016 à 13:30, Santens Seppe <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > Are there any sensitivities I should know of when adding “road” axes in > pedestrian areas? My idea is to add to OSM the axes that are in the GRB > (Agiv) to aid pedestrian routing. I’ve seen this in some places, in others > not (yet?). Is it considered ok to do this? Or would you advice against > this because these “virtual axes” cannot be verified in the field? > > > > Seppe > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
