Oh yes, one more thing: traffic signs are often contradictory (e.g. different message at beginning and end of the street), which of course is very frustrating…
Van: Santens Seppe Verzonden: vrijdag 3 maart 2017 10:45 Aan: 'OpenStreetMap Belgium' Onderwerp: RE: [OSM-talk-be] Missing oneway:bicycle=no Thanks for this script André. It’s simple, but it clearly shows where there is work to do. I’ve corrected a few situations in Ghent. Some remarks/questions: · I’ve seen the combination of oneway=no and cycleway=opposite. I guess the latter tag should (always?) be deleted in this case (of course given that the oneway=no is correct). Or could there be a reason why it is there? · Things can get complicated/confusing when you have a separately mapped cycle track running along the way that is tagged with oneway=yes (and possibly bicycle=use_sidepath). · I think it’s a good idea to always tag oneway:bicycle=yes in combination with oneway=yes where applicable (because not having an exception for bicycles in a oneway=yes street is usually an exception, if you get what I mean). This could help verification by others. Cheers, Seppe Van: André Pirard [mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 14 februari 2017 17:35 Aan: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools; OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: [OSM-talk-be] Missing oneway:bicycle=no I once read that routes of cyclists using OSM were laughed at by the others... oneway=yes<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway> is a routing tag (used by GSM) indicating that only one way of the highway can be used. That page says that the exception for bicycles to run contraflow is oneway:bicycle<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle>=no. And that cycleway<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway>=opposite* is added for compatibility. Also, Key:cycleway says that oneway:bicycle<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle>=no. must be used with cycleway=opposite. All in all it makes much sense that only one oneway:bicycle<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle>=no routing tag be used to allow bicycle contraflow. And that other tags like cycleway=* are not routing tags to be used by routing software (GSM). They are just tags giving more detail about how the bicycles run. Why would a multitude of duplicating routing tags like detour:bicycle=yes or shortcut:bicycle=yes be used Indeed? Unfortunately, while writing an overpass script I noticed that many cycleway=opposite* exist without oneway:bicycle=no and even without oneway=yes. Please run this script<http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%0A%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A60%5D%3B%0A%2F%2F%20gather%20results%0A%28%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20%0A%20way%5B%21%22oneway%3Abicycle%22%5D%5Bcycleway%7E%22opposite%22%5D%28%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D%29%3B%0A%20%20%0A%29%3B%0A%2F%2F%20print%20results%0Aout%20body%3B%0A%3E%3B%0Aout%20skel%20qt%3B%0A%0A> to find some of them. I'm not going to give the nonOSM people I work with overly complicated instructions. I'm not going to make a complicated script. To write it "for the errors". Could we please correct those mistakes? Cheers André.
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
