..at the wrong 3 files. I provided the other one as follows: That is the file that the SPW told me applies to "consulter". Unfortunately, although it is linked by the other 3 files, it just disappeared from their Web (1) (am I a lucky chap?). Additionally, I told them that it should appear under "conditions" under "consulter" and there was no reaction (1). Anyway, "Aucune contrainte d'accès pour la consultation" is copied from it I swear and it speaks by itself. At this point of this game, the official SPW document sent by e-mail achieves my goal which is to reassure the mappers that the SPW won't sue them and to stop the vigilantes' threatening. Anyone not satisfied with the contents of the SPW Web should obviously discuss that with them and not us (1). And it would be yourself or Julien Fastré to fix the detail here above with the SPW. "Aucune contrainte d'accès pour la consultation" means "public domain". Isn't that compatible? Now if you have a high-brow name like ZORGLUB for PD, just use it instead. That is why I made it absolutely sure that it won't happen with the SPW and the PICC. (1) They have official Web pages, they have an official e-mail address on it, that from which I received the official document I showed. Anyone can write to them that their ass is not public domain. But I would consult Julien first. I myself have no more time to lose with nit picking. Happy mapping, Cheers, Cordialement,
|
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be