I think https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways gives the solution, there needs to be an F9 sign. If not, it is a primary.
regards m On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:24 AM, OSMDoudou <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Can you help with the B) part of the discussion ? > > What highway value is suitable for R50 ? > > Now that I discovered the local implicit characteristics thanks to the > answer to question A), trunk is probably right, but I wanted to ask your > views nonetheless. > > Thx. > ________________________________ > From: Volker Schmidt > Sent: 18-01-18 09:39 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle > > I suppose Osmose uses the country specific tables in [1] > The table for Belgium states that bicycle=no is implicit for > "highway=trunk". > Hence the short way in question would need to have the additional tag > "bicycle=yes" for bicycle routing to pass along that cycle lane. > The road signs out there seem to be consistent, there are "no-bicycle" sign > along the ring road, except for this short piece. > > Your second point regarding the road classification trunk is a different > issue, that needs to be discussed with the Belgian community. > > [1] > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions > > On 17 January 2018 at 22:45, OSMDoudou > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> This is a two-fold question in fact. >> >> >> >> (A) >> >> >> >> Osmose raises error "Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle" [1] on a >> segment of the R50 highway [2] [3]. >> >> >> >> I'm guessing it's because the segment is part of relation for a bike route >> but it's tagged as trunk (as the rest of R50), and a trunk would imply a >> restriction for bicycles. >> >> >> >> Although, I see such an implication for motorways [4], I don't see it for >> trunks [5]. >> >> >> >> Do you know what causes the access mismatch, because I don't see it from >> the tags ? >> >> >> >> (B) >> >> >> >> This issue raises the question whether R50 should be tagged as trunk in >> the first place. >> >> >> >> The Wiki page [6] refers to notions like "high performance" and road signs >> F9. But the road is limited to 70 km/h and there are no F9 signs on the >> entries and exits of R50, only C19 "No entry for pedestrians" and C11 + C9 >> "No entry for bicycles" + "No entry for mopeds (and mofas)", which tend to >> confirm it's not a trunk. >> >> >> >> I wonder if primary wouldn't be more accurate classification, although the >> Wiki refers to a "highway linking large towns" [7], which is not the case >> here as the highway is a ring around the city not a road between cities. >> >> >> >> What type of road would you qualify the entire R50 ? >> >> >> >> Thx. >> >> >> >> [1] http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/error/15216104253 >> >> [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/251684307 >> >> [3] https://goo.gl/maps/khpwvm8kxQw >> >> [4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway >> >> [5] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trunk >> >> [6] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium >> >> [7] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
