For what it is worth (and I do not think much of that, myself!): the
landuse tag is one of the most confusing and most misused.
In my self-assigned job of mapping aerodromes, and improving on them, I
often see tags like
landuse=grass
and that seems incorrect to me, it ought to be surface=grass rather
Correct usage of landuse includes (in my very personal appreciation!)
landuse=industrial, landuse=military, landuse=commercial,
landuse=recreational and more such. What that means to the mapping of
highways is beyond my comprehension; and, to be frank, beyond my
interest. I only wanted to give my opinion on the general usage of the
landuse= tag. Perhaps the best application of the landuse tag to
highways - but also to railways, canals, aerodromes, &c, would be
landuse=infrastructure or landuse=public_infrastructure
NB wasn't there a dedicated mailing list about tagging?
For what it is worth,
On 19/03/2019 18:33, Stijn Rombauts via Talk-be wrote:
Hi,
What are the opinions these days about landuse mapping: connect
landuses to highways or let space between landuse polygons and
adjacent highways? Is there a consensus or can everyone do whatever
he/she likes?
My opinion: I *hate* landuse connected to highways.
Regards,
StijnRR
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
