landuse=highway also exist (small diff with area:highway : it include all the highway land, including verges and not only the usable part)
Le 19.03.19 à 21:07, Lionel Giard a écrit : > For what i understand, the landuse=grass is mostly a "landcover=grass" > tag which was never properly named (and thus it is used like that). The > surface=grass alone doesn't mean much in OSM as the surface tag is (i > think) only a secondary tag (adding information to other object like > highway=* ). > > For the original question, it seems indeed to be less accepted to > connect the landuse to the highway! And i find that it is so much easier > to edit when it is not connected to the highway (or to the landuse on > the other side) as it can just be directly moved without splitting > first. If you want to map the area of an highway there is the proposal > of tag "area:highway=*" that can be used but is not rendered at the > moment (see here : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area). But > it could in the future if the usage become more prevalent. > > Le mar. 19 mars 2019 à 19:55, Karel Adams <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > > For what it is worth (and I do not think much of that, myself!): the > landuse tag is one of the most confusing and most misused. > > In my self-assigned job of mapping aerodromes, and improving on > them, I often see tags like > > landuse=grass > > and that seems incorrect to me, it ought to be surface=grass rather > > Correct usage of landuse includes (in my very personal > appreciation!) landuse=industrial, landuse=military, > landuse=commercial, landuse=recreational and more such. What that > means to the mapping of highways is beyond my comprehension; and, to > be frank, beyond my interest. I only wanted to give my opinion on > the general usage of the landuse= tag. Perhaps the best application > of the landuse tag to highways - but also to railways, canals, > aerodromes, &c, would be landuse=infrastructure or > landuse=public_infrastructure > > NB wasn't there a dedicated mailing list about tagging? > > For what it is worth, > > > On 19/03/2019 18:33, Stijn Rombauts via Talk-be wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What are the opinions these days about landuse mapping: connect >> landuses to highways or let space between landuse polygons and >> adjacent highways? Is there a consensus or can everyone do >> whatever he/she likes? >> My opinion: I *hate* landuse connected to highways. >> >> Regards, >> >> StijnRR >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
