Actually, after reading the wiki pages, `cycle_network=BE:cycle_highway` seems indeed the best choice here.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 19:45:39 +0100 (CET), "s8evq" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:35:51 +0100, Pieter Vander Vennet > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > *Tagging scheme* > > > > I'd actually go for `cycle_network=BE:cycle_highway`, as cycle_network > > normally has a country prefix. Because most (all?) of them are already > > tagged, we could simply update the tagging all at once. I'll do that > > next week, unless a better proposal or good reason not to is raised. > > > Concerning the tagging, would perhaps the new tag "network:type" be of any > help? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network:type It was invented > for the use with value node_network, but could perhaps take other values? > > If we can be critical? What makes a "Fietssnelweg" different from another > long distance route like LF5 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5285 Only > the operator key? > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
