Hey everyone, After some silence in this thread, I would like to close it with a small wrap-up.
As the consensus is clear, I've created a wiki page describing the tag in detail <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycle_network%3Dcycle_highway>. Feel free to update, add or correct on this page. Additionally, I've added links and updated tagging on a few wiki pages where I encountered the old tagging. Secondly, I would wish to thank Polyglot for his extensive work on the mapping of these cycle networks and to already execute the changes described here! Thirdly, I would like to thank everyone involved for all the ideas and the constructive way everything was discussed! Kind regards & best wishes for 2020, Pietervdvn On 26.12.19 11:16, EeBie wrote: > I am checking some cycling highways with status proposed and keep the > parts that are released as usable (Befietsbaar) in the relation and > delete the status proposed to make them visible and usable in > routeplanners. > I experienced that the information on the website Fietssnelwegen.be is > not 100% correct. There are parts released where no bike access is > allowed. I leave these parts out and also the parts over unpaved paths > that are difficult for usual bikes. > > Eebie > > Op 25/12/19 om 13:14 schreef joost schouppe: >> Hi Jo, >> >> I think that's the right thing to do, thank you. >> >> What I'm still a bit unclear about: if the route itself is >> unfinished, but large sections of them are, then I would think the >> finished parts do deserve a "ready for use state". We talked about >> this briefly before, maybe someone here has an idea how to split up >> the route (say F3) in three types of subrelations : >> >> - usable, ready and waymarked (so similar to any "normal" cycle route) >> - usable but not ready or waymarked (here the route is proposed, I'd say) >> - unusable (here the ways themselves are proposed) >> >> As stated by Stijn and Eebie, the connections "invented" by Jo don't >> belong in OSM. However some of these detours are in fact waymarked. >> For example, in the cycle highway Brussel-Halle there is an official >> detour that will be in place for two years. I'm not sure if this kind >> of situation needs to ge in a fourth type... >> >> Joost >> >> Op di 24 dec. 2019 10:57 schreef Jo <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> All the figments of my imagination have been removed. I reviewed >> the remaining ones, and fixed them here and there. Where it's not >> possible to use them today to get from the start till the end, >> they are marked as state=proposed. >> >> Jo >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Pieter Vander Vennet
<<attachment: pietervdvn.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
