Hi Wannes and Frank, I think that is about the numbered node network. That's a different network from the cycle_highway network. We tag that one at the rcn level. Of course it's odd if the node numbers differ between 2 renderings.
Jo On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:43 PM Frank Vdm <[email protected]> wrote: > I see difference in node numbers, view arrond st Vith. > https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14!50.2864!6.1335 > https://www.ostbelgien.eu/nl/fiets/fietsrouteplaner > > Op wo 7 okt. 2020 om 11:29 schreef Wannes Soenen <[email protected]>: > >> >> >> Op 7 okt. 2020, om 10:40 heeft Jo <[email protected]> het volgende >> geschreven: >> >> In Wallonia they don't have cycle highways yet, but they have had RaVeL >> for longer than we do in Flanders. OK, it's not a network yet, but that can >> change. >> >> >> https://www.ostbelgien.eu/nl/fiets/fietsrouteplaner >> >> Eastbelgium (German speaking part of Wallonia) has a cycle network with >> numbers and signposts. It contains the Vennbahn (which is part of the RaVel) >> (Also a walking network at >> https://www.ostbelgien.eu/nl/wandelen/wandelrouteplaner ) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
