Thanks, I made the changes, im using the tag "operator=*" and using the star as a 'fixme', so map users would fill it in with the company name that owns the rail. I don't use the word 'fixme' because its not manditory & its more important to tag the name.
Re: snowshed i am entering it as 'tunnel', however i do think its worth getting a special icon for it. Or maybe 'shed' would be better? As that is used in railyards, but it could almost be classified as a building. -Needs further investigation before dismissing. IMO Cheers, Sam On 2/27/09, Daniel Bégin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sam, > > > > Yes, I work there. Over the years, I’ve been involved in many NRCan data > production projects. > > > > When you ask if the information come directly from the source, I can just > refer to what I learned during theses projects or what I can get from the > database (witch provide data for canvec) – the information I provide is not > an NRCan response about the canvec product! > > > > However, concerning railways… > > > > railway:competence > > operator=* would be great but actually there is nothing but federal > legislative authority in the database. Furthermore the tag refers to > legislative authority, not to the owner (CN, CP …). > > > > railway:gauge > > I just had a look at the database (and on the internet) to get the > information I’ve provided to you > > > > railway:support > > Yes, unknown should be set to railway=rail > > > > By the way, thanks for the time and energy you’re putting in it! > > > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
