On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think relations are the way to go. > Tag the way with the source, uuid and attribution. > Split the way at each prov/state/county/regional municipality junction. > Add tags only at highest level relation for say, name, place, > population, ... What would you put for a way that describes a border? Would you tag it as a national border, and then use relations for the counties and such, or would you just put attribution, uuid and source tags, and then tag relations as below. > Include the way in Canada relation - boundary=admin, admin_level=2 > Include the way in USA relation - boundary=admin, admin_level=2 > Include the way in state/prov/muni/county relations as appropriate. Can we create relations in sections? I'm thinking of a situation where I would create a relation for the international border between the US and Canada, as well as the provincial/state border between Alberta and Montana. Would those relations render just like the ways currently? James VE6SRV _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
