On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Richard Weait<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Lennard<[email protected]> wrote: >> Richard Weait wrote: >> >>> I think the provincial / state borders will continue to be yucky on >>> the main map until mapnik supports rendering different style sheets >> >> As you guys in the North Americas might will probably already have >> noticed, the main mapnik style now shows state boundaries, and also >> labels them either by ref or name, depending on zoom. >> >> I wrote something on talk-us last week, but I apparently forgot to >> include talk-ca, as I wasn't subscribed to talk-ca at the time. >> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-August/001522.html > > Oh, that is very nice. I'm surprised I missed that on the first time > around. Excellent work by ldp (Lennard) and delta_foxtrot2. > > So we USA-ians have a few nodes to move for place=state; > Canucks, do we have to clean up some border artifacts? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=60&mlon=-90&layers=B000FTF&zoom=6
To make things clear, should the place=state tag be placed on, near the node for the capital city of the state? Cheers, Adam _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
