On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Adam Glauser <adamglau...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I was cleaning up some areas where the TCT shares its path with roads > and other existing trails (here http://osm.org/go/ZXnePd73--, if you are > interested). > > It appears that there used to be a relation, which was part of a mass > deletion recently (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/146837). > Should this relation be resurrected, a new one created, or something else?
Hey, Sam! Adam found something with our fingerprints on it! ;-) Adam, the history here http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/146837/history shows that this was deleted deliberately by andrzej as the relation had no members. The discussion andrzej referenced in his delete comment (How very polite, by the way!) asked about the validity of relations or ways with no members as a data quality / validity question. So I think andrzej deletion should stand for now. Earlier in the history Sam (acrosscanadatrails) says I asked him to remove his earlier work. I don't recall the details of the conversation, but I probably did. That Adam found part of the relation in Ontario. Sam's earlier additions in that history discussed trail portions in BC. Sam do you recall the details? Should this relation be replaced, without members or 'fixed' with members added? Best regards, Richard _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
