Dave, Understood, I would envision it being a partially manual and partially automated process.
Maybe I'm confused about the address versus road information. I would think the address point would be the front door of the building and would not be a relation to the road. So the node of the address and the way of the road would not be on top of each other. Is this incorrect? -Kate Chapman On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote: > > What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations > > where we have point level address data? > > The issue is that it may not line up with the roads at all. We also > need to ensure that we *find* the roads to which it refers to ensure > that we get the relations done properly. > > If people find a way to do that, it shouldn't be a problem. > > > Or are you just referring to not importing the addressing that is > > available for the Tiger data? > -- Dave > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
