Dave Hansen wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote: >> What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations >> where we have point level address data? > > The issue is that it may not line up with the roads at all. We also > need to ensure that we *find* the roads to which it refers to ensure > that we get the relations done properly.
That sometimes is the case. Portland's west hills (as well as other parts of the state prone to landslide) often leave addresses from one street (or even a street that no longer exists) connecting to another street entirely, in some cases quite some distance from the original road connection. One of my friends in Salem also lives in a neighborhood that demonstrates this... the 100 block of Wander Way forms a single L-shaped block, with the top of the L paralell to the 100 block of 24th Street SE. The 200 block of 24th Street is barely long enough to fit a compact car in before it terminates in a permanent Type III barricade, yet the 200 block has addresses going almost to 300. The odd side of the 200 Block 24th Street is actually the odd side of the base of the L where the street leaves the City's path of address interpolation. _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
