On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Bégin, Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > We then decided to use the concept of high/low water levels instead. The > Permanency attribute indicates if the feature represents a low water level > (1-permanent) or an area between the low and high water level > (2-Intermittent). In this case (2), we don't modify anymore a feature based > on the actual water limit, as long the water limits is within the > Intermittent feature. [ ... ] > I hope I made it clearer.
Thank you for this information, Daniel. > Concerning Osm, there is no water level definition for the moment but there > is a proposed feature that match perfectly (*)! > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_cover > > If accepted, there will be a perfect - and easy - match between Canvec and > Osm water body definition. Can this proposed feature be moved forward? Should > we use this feature even if not accepted yet? Sure, we should use it. That proposal has been around since 2007. This sometimes happens with things on the wiki; people move on and start using the tag but the wiki lies unchanged. OsmDoc shows us that the tag is already in use. http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/water/#values _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
