Couldn't you just tag your tracks with accuracy=1m etc? Russell
On 2010-07-07, at 8:36 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I will be interested to see what all people have to say about this. :) >> >> I for one wish I could get access to some survey-grade GPS equipment. But >> its just so darn expensive. > > Even with expensive equipment the 'tracks' can still be somewhat dubious. > The biggest problem OSM has is that there's no measure of quality stored > within the tracks (although it is technically possible to include > PDOP/HDOP/etc values with the GPX). > > Ultimately you have no idea whether I was using a $25,000 L1/L2/RTK system > or a $150 garmin slung in a back pack, this means that I'm the only one > who can really say whether my tracks are 'golden'. > > Multiple tracks through the same area might hint at a quality measure, but > also may be subject to the same interference such as multipath and > obstructions. > > Simon. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
