Oops, should have gone to the list. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Tyler Gunn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:52:14 -0600, Brent Fraser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Tyler, >>> >>> Have you considered using the 1:20k data published by the Manitoba >>> government? I think the license is compatible with OSM's, but you'd >> have >>> to >>> have a look at it. >>> >>> https://mli2.gov.mb.ca/ (free registration required for downloading) >>> (Click on "Topographic Maps" -> "1:20,000 Seamless") >>> >>> The transportation file has roads with 10 to 20 classes.... >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Brent Fraser >> >> Hey Brent, >> Thanks for that; it looks like there's quite a wealth of data available >> there!!! I am going to have to read over the license again and make sure >> it's compatible; there is a LOAD of data in there that I could make use of, >> including municipal boundaries, building shapes, etc. >> The road network is also quite comprehensive as you say and has a wealth >> of classification data that could supplement the Canvec data quite nicely. >> >> Great to see there is yet another useful resource out there! > > I feel like a broken record. ;-) > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_guidelines#Make_sure_data_license_is_OK > > I wasn't able to find the license on the Manitoba site. Any chance > you could link to it, and send it to the License Working Group? >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
